home | email gus | email sarah | email valerie | photos | flickr photos
blogs
comics
music
stuff

2.28.2004



2.24.2004
you got to sell my brain



explanation and analysis here. fascinating.



2.23.2004
fun with copyright

1968: beatles release the white album.

2003: jay-z releases the black album.

2004: hip-hop dj danger mouse takes both, remixes and makes something new: the grey album.

2004: beatles label emi sends cease and desist letters to websites hosting danger mouse's reworking, citing copyright violations. anticorporatelabel music activists get their backs up, come up with grey tuesday, an internet protest in which websites will either turn grey in support of danger mouse and downhillbattle or will actually host the the grey album for download -- a virtual form, one suspects, of civil disobedience for the 21st century. wandering copyright zealot lawrence lessig and the electronic frontier foundation sign on to lend their support. riaa presumably prepares to take notes of potential violators, argues (justifiedly under current law) that grey album likely violates united states copyright law for use of copyrighted material without license from holder.

2004: dahlberg listens to grey album, declares it "okay".




2.22.2004

the first time i met him, when val brought me to meet her family on one of those early days, he told me that he'd gotten his start as a bootlegger running hooch across the ohio river. his wife, he told me, had been his getaway driver -- that's how they'd met. in retrospect, i should have recognized that twinkle in his eye -- too much like my own grandfather's was when i was growing up, bemused and mischevious. i bought it, of course, because i never really learned to tell when someone i wouldn't suspect was pulling my leg. it wasn't until after i left that they told me he'd been kidding me. "oh yeah, i figured," i said, playing it off. but i'd bought it.

he was always like that. smiling, always positive, a little devilish when he wanted to be. i don't know if "rascal" is the right word, but i have the feeling that had i known him when he was younger, it probably would have fit perfectly. he was scrappy; we thought, despite the many problems he'd had, that he was probably indestructible. when i'd see him, i'd always ask how he was doing. "pretty good for an old bugger," he'd say.

you certainly were, ernest.

we'll miss you.




2.21.2004
drool

i don't even know what this is, but man, do i want to find out now.

http://202.212.245.207/htmls/movie/trailer_high.html



ganked from charlie chu



2.19.2004



2.17.2004



2.10.2004
lobo is teh r0x0r



2.08.2004
world of wheels

didn't think i'd end up at a car show on a sunday afternoon.









yes, that last one says "home at last".



2.07.2004
media giant does something unpopular, people complain

received in email:

as you know, cbs refused to run moveon voter fund's "child's pay" ad -- perhaps the most tasteful and uncontroversial advocacy ad in history -- during the super bowl. cbs executives claimed they had a blanket policy against all so-called "issue" ads.

yesterday, we learned that the network plans to broadcast an ad promoting the bush medicare prescription drug law. this is part of a $13 million taxpayer-financed tv campaign to take the heat off the white house for pushing through a drug plan that benefits drug companies and insurance companies more than medicare recipients.

the white house ad features the tagline "same medicare. more benefits." but a report by consumers union last month said that most people covered by medicare will wind up spending more for prescription drugs, as a result of the provisions in the law which favor drug companies. according to the washington post, the campaign is intended "to counteract democratic criticism that changes to the (medicare) program will harm older americans."

if that isn't a controversial issue ad, we don't know what is. but since cbs appears to be changing its policy, our voter fund has submitted our own medicare ad which exposes the facts behind this spin campaign to run on cbs. so far, we haven't heard back. please give cbs a call today to let them know that they need to either pull the white house ads or run ours.

you can reach cbs at:

phone:
les moonves, president of cbs
(323) 575-2345

email:
newmediasales@cbs.com

web form:
http://www.cbs.com/info/user_services/fb_global_form.shtml

...

we're spreading out the calls across a number of relevant cbs numbers, so hopefully you won't get a busy signal. also, we have no quarrel with cbs news or any cbs journalists, who have actually given fair coverage to cbs corporate's unfair decision. please don't call the cbs news desk.

there's another issue involved here that needs to be taken very seriously: if bush's medicare ad is intended to function as a campaign ad (and that clearly appears to be the case) then this may constitute a criminal election law violation. in fact, the ad company which made the ad which will air on cbs also works for the bush/cheney re-election committee. we've put in a freedom of information act request to the department of health and human services to begin the process of establishing the facts in this case.

for now, help us hold cbs accountable by asking them to stop running the bush medicare ad -- or to accept ours.

sincerely,
--adam, carrie, eli, james, joan, laura, noah, peter, wes, and zack
the moveon.org team
february 5th, 2004


so, first: moveon.org is a democratic leaning political action group founded during lewinskygate (its original, central idea: a petition to congress to "censure and move on"; thus, the name.) no doubt you've seen at least one of moveon's ads regarding the state of the union address or the medicare changes (the bush pulls the rug out ad.)

certainly moveon can be somewhat... shrill when it comes to their anti-bush rhetoric (witness the bush in 30 seconds ad contest, an interesting if slanted concept.) that said, however, you can't deny that in this case, they would seem to have a point. i didn't necessarily agree with cbs's choice not to air the bi30s ad during the super bowl, but it's their network, their call. but to run the bush administration's ad, which probably should have been excluded on the same basis... well, now we're into trickier territory.

in any event, some interesting reading and thinking here. is cbs's denial of the ad a violation of freedom of expression, or just a corporate entity exercising its own sound business judgment? does this violate federal election laws, as moveon apparently believes? is it a big surprise that cbs skews conservatively? should we care?

just some things to think about on a wintery saturday night.




2.06.2004
do you know who i am?

the boston herald's howie carr purports to know the real john kerry. ouch.



2.03.2004
spin



www.flickr.com
amazon wishlist
weblog commenting by haloscan.comthis page is powered by blogger. isn't yours?moblogging by mfop2